Legal Opinion

Horton v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1988No. 87-185PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The only question presented by this appeal is whether the admission of testimony from a physician treating a shooting victim in a hospital emergency room that included statements of the victim concerning the identity of his assailant constitutes reversible error. The hearsay statement was offered by the prosecuting attorney under Rule 803(4), W.R.E., relating to statements made for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment. The trial court admitted the testimony, which did not specifically identify the defendant, invoking res gestae as a basis for admission. We hold that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. John Louis Iron Shell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. LP v. Natrona County Department of Public Assistance & Social ServicesWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Wilbert C. Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State FarmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  4. Jahnke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bishop v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. RoseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  2. Stephens v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Armstrong v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. James v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Belden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API