Legal Opinion

Heartland Lysine, Inc. v. State, Department of Revenue & Finance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 21, 1993No. 92-430PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMAN, Justice.

This is a taxpayer’s challenge to the imposition of use taxes on electrical equipment purchased for its plant in Eddyville, Iowa. The taxpayer claims that the equipment taxed is essential to the processing of its product and, therefore, exempt under Iowa Code section 423.4 (1987). The dis trict court upheld the tax on judicial review. We affirm.

Appellant Heartland Lysine, Inc. is one of only two facilities in the country manufacturing lysine, an amino acid used as an additive in swine and poultry feed. Heartland’s modern facility produces the lysine in a two-stage process.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fischer Artificial Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Linwood Stone Products Co. v. State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Sallis v. Employment Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. Maschino v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. Ballstadt v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. The Sherwin-williams Company Vs. Iowa Department Of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. McMahon v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  3. Ranniger v. Iowa Department of Revenue & FinanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  4. Dial Corp. v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. Harlan Sprague Dawley, Inc. v. Iowa State Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API