Legal Opinion

Claim of Gisner v. Dunlop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 5, 1920Published

Appeal by the defendants, Hugh Dunlop and another, from an award of the State Industrial Commission, entered in the office of said Commission on the 12th day of June, 1919.

1Opinion of the Court

John M. Kellogg, P. J.:

The employer was carrying on a small farm and a small trucking business. He kept two teams. The farm was used principally in furnishing supplies for the farm and teams. The farm work, in great part, was done by the employer; the trucks were driven by the employee. Occasionally the employee helped on the farm and sometimes the employer drove a truck. On the day in question the employee said *634in the morning he had some errands to do for himself and would not work in the forenoon; he said he would take some shoes over to the shoe shop and have them fixed. He returned about…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Culhane v. Economical Garage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API