Legal Opinion

Leedy v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM PIAMILTON. . Error to the Circuit Court of Hamilton County.— Nathan L. Bachman, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

Plaintiff brought suit as addressee of a telegraph message sent over defendant’s line from Hárrisburg, Pa., to Chattanooga, Tenn., for failure to deliver same at the pont of contract delivery. The court of civil appeals has found that the telegraph company was guilty of very great negligence, or gross negligence as we understand, in failing to deliver the telegram; hut that court further held that the defendant company was not liable because of a stipulation which appeared up*549on the back of the message, which became a part of the contract, to wit:

“In any event, the company shall not be liable…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Primrose v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Commercial Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. United States Telegraph Co. v. GildersleveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SchadeTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API