Legal Opinion

Richter v. Buchanan

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1907No. 7023PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, McCredie, J., entered March 15, 1907, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for conversion.

1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.

This is an action for damages for conversion of property. The court found that, at the time the hereinafter described contract was entered into, the plaintiff was the owner in possession of the stock of goods described; that, for the purpose of securing to be paid to said defendants the sum of $2,628.37, then owing by plaintiff to defendants, plaintiff made, executed, and delivered to defendants a deed to the real estate described, and to further secure the payment of said sum, executed a chattel mortgage of the personal property, which was the stock of goods; that it was agreed in *33said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. GowanWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Brockway v. AbbottWashington Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wintler Abstract & Loan Co. v. SearsWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Parks v. Yakima Valley Production Credit Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Trudell v. Hingham State BankMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API