Legal Opinion
Hull v. Caughy
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 12, 1886PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, in Equity. ‘ The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtAlvey, C. J.
The order appointing the receiver was passed on the 2d of March, 1886, from which no appeal was taken ; hut after filing their answer, the defendants moved to rescind the order of appointment, and on the 10th of April, 1886, the Court passed an order refusing to rescind its previous order, whereby the receiver was appointed ; and it is from that order of the 10th of April, 1886, that the present appeal has been taken.
The appellee has moved to dismiss the appeal, and it is clear the motion must prevail. The order from which the appeal is taken is in no sense an order in the nature of a final…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ellicott v. United States InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1848
- Voshell v. HynsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
- Speights v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1851
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stockley v. Jacob Thomas & SonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
- Baltimore Skate Manufacturing Co. v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
- Monumental Mutual Life Insurance v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
- Spivery-Jones v. Receivership Estate of Trans Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- R. Frank Williams Co. v. United States Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1897