Legal Opinion
The Concourse Group, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 19, 2017No. 17-129CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Post-Award Bid Protest; Standard of Review for Agency’s Technical Evaluation of Proposals; Unstated Evaluation Criteria; Formal Requirements in a FAR Subpart 8.4 Procurement.
OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
The parties in this post-award bid protest have filed cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record pursuant to Rule 52.1 of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”).. Plaintiff Concourse Group, LLC, the losing bidder on a military housing privatization initiative (“MHPI”) contract, alleges primarily that the Government applied an unstated criterion while evaluating bids: namely, that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Alfa Laval Separation, Inc. v. United States, and Westfalia Separators, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Allied Technology Group, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arxium, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Trax International Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026