Legal Opinion

Sauls v. Bristol-Myers Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 22, 1978No. 78 Civ. 2400PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Plaintiff Kenneth Sauls, a former employee in defendant Bristol-Myers’ Internal Audit Department, commenced this employment discrimination action, alleging that because of his race and color he was subjected to discriminatory treatment while in the defendant’s employ, was fired on the pretense of substandard work performance, and has been denied redress by the New York State Human Rights Division and the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) because of a continuing conspiracy between the defendant and these agencies. He further claims…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Patricia D. Deubert and Sonya M. Deroche v. Gulf Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. Dugar v. CoughlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. Bower v. WeismanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  4. Alexander v. Washington Gas Light Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  5. Powell v. KopmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API