Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Phillips

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 2005No. COA04-933Published

1ConcurrenceWynn, Judge

I write separately to note in passing1 an apparently on-going occurrence in our judiciary in which judges are permitted, without restriction, under our Code of Judicial Conduct to engage in ex parte discussions on issues of law with individuals (“disinterested experts”) who are not parties to the proceeding. N.C. Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 3(A)(4) (2003).2

In this case, the trial court initially indicated that it would admit evidence of a telephone conversation that Corriher allegedly had with Defendant. Shortly thereafter, however, the State withdrew Corriher’s testimony. The trial court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Lumberton v. McCaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Rogers v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Onuska v. BarnwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API