Stevens v. Bradley & Son
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Appanoose District Court. — Hon. E. L. Burton, Judge. Action at law' to recover damages for breach of warranty, and for fraud and deceit, in the sale of hogs by the defendants to the plaintiff.. There was a trial by jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.
' warranty': false ropreliability118: On the twentieth day of October, 1889, the defendants sold some three hundred and twenty hogs at public sale. The plaintiff-bid off and purchased twenty-seven of said -hogs? ^01’ which he gave his promissory note for one hundred and fourteen dollars. He claims that at the' time of the sale said hogs were sick and infected with a contagious disease known as “hog cholera,” by reason of which disease twenty-five of them died, and the other two became of no value.
This action was brought on the twenty-sixth day of July, 1890, and the petition is in two counts.…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Campbell v. ParkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Mitchell v. PinckneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Larson v. CalderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Eagle Iron Works v. Des Moines Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Passcuzzi v. PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.