Legal Opinion

Hardwick v. Reddy

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 7, 1990No. Docket 110031PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:.

Defendant appeals by leave granted the circuit court’s order denying his motion for summary disposition. He alleges that plaintiff’s medical malpractice claim is barred by the statute of limitations. MCR 2.116(C)(7). We disagree and affirm.

In October, 1981, plaintiff began seeing defendant, a psychiatrist, for various mental problems and for periodic impotency. As part of the treatment, defendant prescribed two drugs, Dalmane and Desyrel. Plaintiff’s last appointment with defendant was on December 12, 1984. He continued, however, to take the medication after discontinuing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tonegatto v. BudakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Jackson v. VincentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Pendell v. JarkaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Szatkowski v. IsserMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lindsay v. RomanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API