Hardwick v. Reddy
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam:.
Defendant appeals by leave granted the circuit court’s order denying his motion for summary disposition. He alleges that plaintiff’s medical malpractice claim is barred by the statute of limitations. MCR 2.116(C)(7). We disagree and affirm.
In October, 1981, plaintiff began seeing defendant, a psychiatrist, for various mental problems and for periodic impotency. As part of the treatment, defendant prescribed two drugs, Dalmane and Desyrel. Plaintiff’s last appointment with defendant was on December 12, 1984. He continued, however, to take the medication after discontinuing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tonegatto v. BudakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Jackson v. VincentMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Pendell v. JarkaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- Szatkowski v. IsserMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Lindsay v. RomanoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998