Legal Opinion

Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Wood

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 5, 1917No. 8574PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Denver District Court, Hon. John H. Denison, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

The plaintiff in error sold to the defendant in error, under a written contract, a Big Four gas traction engine for the sum of $3,100, with freight to be added from Minneapolis, Minnesota, to Briggsdale, Colorado; $500.00 was to be paid in cash and the remainder in three promissory notes; one for $200.00 due June 15th, 1913; one for $1,200 due November 1st, 1913, and one for $1,200 due November 1st, 1914.

This action is by the defendant in error for a rescission *131of the contract. The agreement was dated March 29th, 1913, and in so far as it seems necessary to consider, recites:

“That as soon as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. St. Vrain Stone Co. v. Denver, Utah & Pacific RairoadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cherrington v. WoodsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. RiekeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  3. Troutman v. StilesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Slide Mines, Inc. v. Denver Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API