In Re Interest of Forrester
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentJustice Newman
At issue in this case is the interplay between the Private Roads Act (PRA)1 and the Agricultural Area Security Law (AASL).2 I disagree with the conclusion reached by the Majority and, therefore, dissent.
In August of 1998, pursuant to Section 11 of the PRA, 36 P.S. § 2731, Robert W. Forrester (Appellee) petitioned the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County (trial court) for the appointment of a Board of View3 to open a 25-foot-wide easement for a “private road” to provide access from his landlocked property to the nearest public road. The trial court granted the petition and, subsequently,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lance's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- Sherman v. BuickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Philadelphia Clay Co. v. York Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Palairet's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Latah County v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.