Harzfeld's, Inc. v. Otis Elevator Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGE, District Judge.
Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first amended complaint is premised on grounds identical with those leveled at plaintiff’s original complaint, as to which this Court ruled adversely to defendant’s contentions, in our previous memorandum. 114 F.Supp. 480. We believe such ruling consonant with the law of Missouri, and perceive no reason for departing therefrom or for further commentary thereon. Notwithstanding defendant’s painstaking effort to distinguish the factual situation in the case at bar from that considered in the authorities cited in our previous…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Flint & Walling Manufacturing Co. v. BeckettIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Nichols v. BresnahanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Lampert v. Judge & Dolph Drug Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Raming v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Reed v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Thomasson v. WinsettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Thomasson v. WinsettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958