Legal Opinion

Medina v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 2005No. 45A03-0408-CR-373Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

MATHIAS, Judge.

On June 2, 2005, this court issued Medina v. State, 828 N.E.2d 427 (Ind.Ct.App.*11432005). On July 5, 2005, Medina filed a petition for rehearing, asserting that this court erroneously relied upon Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 119 S.Ct. 1827, 144 L.Ed.2d 35 (1999). We grant Medina's petition solely to address Medina's claim, and otherwise affirm our original holding.

Medina claims that, in light of Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), Neder's holding that the failure to submit an element to the jury is subject to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. FriedelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Freeze v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Medina v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API