Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Boney
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
Plaintiff sues on three promissory notes, representing the balance due on the purchase price of a 80-60 H. P. tractor and a 2 H. P. electric engine. The notes aggregate $2,500.
Defendant admits the execution and delivery of the notes. He'makes no complaint regarding the electric, engine, but denies liability because (1) he was.induced to purchase the tractor by false and fraudulent representations ; (2) of redhibitory defects in the tractor.
Defendant, in his answer, further sets .up an alleged agreement of settlement wherein it was stipulated that the notes would be canceled and plaintiff…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Breaux v. Winnebago Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
- Reech v. CocoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Twin City Motor Co. v. PettitLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Cleaners Equipment Corp. v. Weil Cleaners, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Scott v. BoylstonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.