Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Van De Kamp v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 22, 1985No. 84-2450PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is one of three that arise from the same litigation. Opinions in all three appeals are being filed simultaneously. For the procedural history and the facts of the underlying litigation, the reader is referred to the opinion of Judge Niel*1322sen in No. 84-2355, 766 F.2d 1308 (9th Cir.1985). We set forth here only the background necessary to an understanding of this appeal, brought by an intervenor in this case.
Tahoe Shorezone Representation (TSR), which represents lakefront property owners at Lake Tahoe, intervened in the litigation against Tahoe Regional Planning…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. MortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
- Paramount Rock Co. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Claude S. BrinegarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Mcclatchy Newspapers v. Central Valley Typographical Union No. 46Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by50 opinions
- Wendy Osorio Martinez v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Habitat Education Center v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Northern Alaska Environmental Center v. Donald P. Hodel, and Alaska Miners Association, Defendants-Intervenors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- California Independent System Operator Corp. v. Reliant Energy Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2001
- People of State of California v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.