United States v. Vanhorn

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Randy Lee Vanhorn appeals the district court’s 2 revocation of his supervised release. Through counsel, he argues he did not violate the condition of supervised release requiring him to stay at a halfway house for six months because his refusals to go to a halfway house were mere talk and he was never told when to arrive at any particular halfway house. Pro se, he argues the condition itself was invalid. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

I

Over a decade ago, a jury convicted Defendant of eleven counts of mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C.…