Legal Opinion
Spota v. Love
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 1, 2016No. 2014-05187PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In a civil forfeiture action pursuant to CPLR article 13-A, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), dated January 16, 2014, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
“ [T]he proponent of a summary judgment motion must make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, tendering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact” (Alvarez v Prospect…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Shapiro v. Health Insurance Plan of Greater New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Baker v. R.T. Vanderbilt Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Quinones v. E & L Transportation, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Katz v. BeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016