Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1943No. Crim. 3661PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

By information, appellant was accused of ten counts of forgery and ten counts of grand theft, to which she entered her plea of “not guilty.” On June 20, 1938, by *678leave ’ of the court, appellant withdrew her plea of “not guilty,” pleaded “guilty” to the offenses charged in counts 1, 2 and 3 of the information and applied for probation. Thereafter appellant was sentenced as to said three counts to the California Institution for Women at Tehachapi, execution of said sentences was suspended and appellant was “placed on probation for a period of ten years under the following conditions: Defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HainlineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. People v. SilvermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. People v. FieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. DellesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. ElderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  5. People v. JohnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API