United States v. Steck
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1ConcurrenceDunbar, Senior Judge
In my opinion the majority is further complicating an already complicated situation. They are superimposing a new set of rules and guidelines dictating when revision and limited rehearing sessions are procedurally valid to cure pleas declared improvident as a matter of law by the holdings in United States v. King, 3 M.J. 458 (C.M.A.1977).
In the instant case, the majority holds that proceedings in revision may cure a defective plea bargain inquiry. At the same time, it is asserted that the procedure of this particular revision proceeding was incorrect because the accused was not advised of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. WilliamsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. GreggU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.