Legal Opinion

Kade v. Sanitary Fireproofing & Contracting Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 15, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The personal representatives of the deceased partner are not necessary parties to this action brought by one who claims to be a surviving partner to compel an accounting by a third person in possession of the partnership assets.

The order of the Appellate Division granting a new trial is not subject to review upon this appeal from the- final judgment (Kade v. Sanitary F. & C. Co., 256 N. Y. 371).

The judgment dismissing the complaint for defect of parties should be reversed without costs.

The appeal from the order granting a new trial should be dismissed.

Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kade v. Sanitary Fireproofing & Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Claim of Daus v. Gunderman & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. In re the Estate of PrinceNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931
  3. Gallotti v. Continental InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API