Legal Opinion
Eddy v. Fogg
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 5, 1906PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.
This is a bill, by the administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Charles W. Holden, for an accounting in respect to various transactions between the plaintiff’s testator and the defendant Fogg. The other defendants are only stakeholders. The case was sent to a master under the usual rule to hear the parties and report his findings with such facts and questions of law as either party might request. The plaintiff filed exceptions to the master’s report. A final decree was entered in the defendant Fogg’s favor by which the plaintiff’s exceptions were overruled and the report was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moore v. DickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- O'Brien v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Wardens & Vestry of St. Paul's Church v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Currier v. StudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Cleveland v. Hampden Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- American Circular Loom Co. v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Cook v. ScheffreenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Lannin v. BuckleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Loan Modification Group, Inc. v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Anderson v. Home National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.