Legal Opinion
United States v. Doe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 25, 1997No. Nos. 95-10455, 95-10561PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
This interlocutory appeal involves an order granting the motion of the United States to proceed against a juvenile as an adult. The United States cross-appeals the district court’s order to suppress certain incriminating statements made by the juvenile. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3731. We affirm the district court’s order granting the motion to proceed against the juvenile as an adult and reverse the district court’s order to suppress the statements made by the juvenile.
*628I
The events at issue took place on the night of April 26, 1991.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Alvarez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Roy Mason AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Lemrick Nelson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Michael Wayne EatonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Sahr I. JARVOUHEY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- People v. RoquemoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.