In re Kadish
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for *227the First Department, moves for an order determining that the crimes of which respondent Charles Kadish has been convicted are "serious crimes” within the meaning of Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d) and directing that respondent be suspended forthwith from the practice of law pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f). Petitioner further requests that respondent be ordered to show cause why a final order of censure, suspension or removal from office should not be made.
Respondent was admitted to practice law in the First…
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re HowleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re HochbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re NeroniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re KadishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998