Legal Opinion

Betz v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1924No. Nos. 4020, 4048, 4158PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In each of these three separate cases the plaintiff in error therein was convicted of conspiring with one Wilson, a druggist, to transport intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes; also of the substantive offense of transporting such liquors for such purposes. Betz and Ewan were also respectively convicted of conspiring with the same druggist to sell such liquor for such purposes, and Betz and Webber were each convicted of unlawfully possessing such liquors for such purposes.

In each of the cases it is contended here that there was no evidence that the liquor contained at least one-half of 1…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Abrams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Holder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  2. Nibbelink v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
  3. United States v. Ellis WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API