Lowrey v. Richmond & Danville Railroad
Supreme Court of Georgia
Service. Process. Amendment. Before Judge Van Epps. City court of Atlanta. June term, 1889. Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Blandeord, Justice.
1. It is assigned as error in this record that the court erred in dismissing the plaintiff’s action for the want of sufficient process, it appearing that the petition setting forth the plaintiff’s cause of action was addressed to the city court of Atlanta, and that process was prayed returnable to that court, but that the clerk of. the superior court of Fulton county, who is also ex officio clei’k of the city court of Atlanta, annexed a process to the declaration and copy declaration which was served on the defendant, requiring the defendant to appear at an impossible term…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Brown & Carmichael v. Way & TayLorSupreme Court of Georgia · 1862
3Cited by6 opinions
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Benson & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Crown Laundry v. BurchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Kelly v. FudgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. PritchardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.