Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Curtis Bay Towing Co. of Pennsylvania
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 13, 1966No. 41, 43 of 1961PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER
BODY, District Judge.
This consolidated suit, in Admiralty, involves claims for damage to the Barge ELECTRIC #20 and the loss of part of its cargo of coal as a result of a stranding in the vicinity of Windy Point (Greenwich) Coal Pier on December 22, 1959, while in the tow of the tug J. H. DEINLEIN, operated by Curtis Bay Towing Company of Pennsylvania.
Two libels were filed against Curtis Bay by Philadelphia Electric Company (owner of the coal) and Oliver Transportation Company (owner of ELECTRIC #20) for their alleged damage.
Curtis Bay impleaded…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. AccardoDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- Brown & Root, Inc. v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Settimo Accardo (Accardi)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Indian Towing Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dow Chemical Company v. Tug Thomas AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972
- Afran Transport Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- Afran Transport Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- George F. Barrie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Richmond Marine Panama, S.A. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.