Legal Opinion · Dissent

Paras v. Paras

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 19, 1972No. 71-867Published

1DissentWalden, Judge

(dissenting) :

I respectfully dissent.

My analysis of the agreement, without laboring it, is that the payments constituted lump sum alimony and nothing more or less. The maximum and the minimum to be paid was precisely prescribed, namely 48 months X $250.00, for a total of $12,000. It was payable monthly or in single sum at the husband’s option. The critical difference here when compared with periodic alimony hinged upon the husband’s common law obligation of support is that in the latter situation, the sum is always indeterminate and depends upon the future life, needs and abilities of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fort v. FortSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  2. Schultz v. SchultzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API