Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pyrke v. Brudno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1935Published

1DissentBliss, J.

I must respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority of the court and the reasons assigned in the opinion of our presiding justice. I do so upon the authority of Wilson v. Israel (227 N. Y. 423); People v. Shoemaker (228 App. Div. 314; affd., without opinion, 254 N. Y. 567), and section 69 of the Co-operative Corporations Law.

The membership contract between the Dairymen’s League Co-operative Association, Inc., and its producer members is substantially, word for word, identical with the contract in the Shoemaker case. As in that case, the sales contract is here made between the league…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . IsraelNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. People v. ShoemakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  3. People v. ShoemakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API