Legal Opinion
Ward v. City of San Jose
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1991No. Nos. 90-15077, 90-15121, 90-15166, 90-15846 and 90-15848PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed in the above case on November 4, 1991, is amended as follows: [Editor’s Note: These amendments have been incorporated in the published opinion.]
With the above amendments, the panel as constituted above has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the suggestion for rehearing en banc. Fed. R.App.P. 35(b).
The petition for rehearing is denied, and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is rejected.
OPINION
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Johnson v. GlickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Smith v. City of HemetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- H.N. Dang v. Gilbert CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Leland Wheeler v. City of Santa ClaraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Gloria Franklin and Johnny Curry v. Derrick FoxworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.