Legal Opinion · Concurrence

M.L.S. v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 24, 1991No. J-89-1260Published

1Concurrence

LANE, Presiding Judge,

specially concurring.

While I am in agreement with the majority opinion, I write to further explain the posture of this ease on remand. As it stands now, the case against M.L.S. has been prosecuted through the statutory procedures defined in 10 O.S.Supp.1989, § 1112, which allow a juvenile to be prosecuted as an adult under certain circumstances. As the majority explains, the two threshold criteria for certification of a juvenile to stand trial as an adult are that the complaint has prosecutive merit and the lack of amenability to rehabilitative opportunities existing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. R.J.D. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990
  2. Matter of JLMCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API