Legal Opinion

Ortiz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 2017No. 3D17-0966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLuck, J.

In trial court case numbers 04-916 and 05-28921B, as a result of a February 2016 negotiated plea, appellant Frank Ortiz was sentenced to seventy-three months in state prison for violating his probation after testing positive for using a controlled substance. 1 In his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(a), Ortiz claimed his trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective because he: (1) did not advise Ortiz about the gain time and conditional release consequences of his plea; and (2) did not present mitigating evidence at the sentencing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Henderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Callaway v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. STEPHEN KENNETH BROWN v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. CHRISTOPHER LYNN KOPPE vs STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
  3. Nikhil Sen Sharma v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Sharma v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API