Legal Opinion

Nacif v. Athira Pharma Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 1, 2024No. 2:21-cv-00861Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 ANTONIO BACHAALANI NACIF; 6 WIES RAFI; and HANG GAO, 7 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 8 Plaintiffs, C21-0861 TSZ 9 v. ORDER AND JUDGMENT 10 ATHIRA PHARMA, INC.; and LEEN KAWAS, Ph.D., 11 Defendants. 12 13 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on (i) plaintiffs’ motion, docket no. 134, 14 for final approval of a proposed class settlement; (ii) a motion for attorneys’ fees, 15 litigation costs, and service awards, docket no. 131, brought by Class Counsel (the firms 16 of Glancy Prongay &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kunckle v. WynickSupreme Court of the United States · 1788
  2. Pincay Investments Co. v. Covad Communications Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API