United States v. Sample
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
The United States government appeals the sentence of Matthew Sample, following his guilty plea to one count of frauds and swindles under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 and two counts of wire fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1343 . In sentencing Sample to a five-year term of probation on the rationale that such a sentence would allow him to repay his victims, the district court essentially sentenced Sample based on his income. We conclude that this sentence was unreasonable. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (b), we reverse and remand for resentencing.
I
Sample…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Michael MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- United States v. LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Barbara E. Stefonek, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Rick A. KuhlmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. WillisDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- United States v. LuceroCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
- United States v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
- Mubarak Sulaiman Ukashat v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.