Legal Opinion

Knupp v. Knupp

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 14, 1993No. 93-89PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUBBART, Judge.

The central question presented for review is whether a party to post-judgment modification proceedings in a marriage dissolution action may, through the party’s counsel, waive the right to have a court reporter present during a general master’s hearing in the case after the parties have agreed to have a general master hear the case. We conclude that such a waiver is legally permissible and was effectively accomplished in this case. Accordingly, we affirm.

I

In July 1992, the husband Galen A. Knupp filed a motion before the circuit court below to modify the child custody…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ahmed v. Travelers Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  2. Ben-Hain v. TacherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. In Re Guardianship of ReadDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Sitomer v. SitomerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Schleiger v. SchleigerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Family Law Rules of ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. De Clements v. De ClementsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Bajwa v. Prime Healthcare Services-Lehigh Acres, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API