Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Board of Education of the City School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Although petitioner did not receive the 60-day written notice that she was not recommended for tenure, as required by Education Law § 2573 (1) (a) and § 3012 (2), and taught for one day after the expiration of her probationary term, we find that she did not acquire tenure by estoppel, since the record shows that respondents did not, “with full knowledge and consent,” permit her to continue to teach after her probationary term expired (see Matter of Gould v Board of Educ. of Sewanhaka Cent. High School Dist., 81 NY2d 446, 451 [1993]). It is undisputed that petitioner was informed in May 2009…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gould v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Hagen v. Board of Education of the Cohoes City School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Graham v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API