Goforth v. Scoggins

From the evidence introduced, it is unquestionable that the automobile claimed by the plaintiffs is the same automobile found in the possession of the defendants and claimed by them. The only question to be determined is whether or not the description in the conditional bill of sale, recorded in Fulton County, is sufficient to give the defendants constructive notice that the automobile found in their possession was the same auto*650mobile as described in the conditional bill of sale. It was held in Shearer v. Housch, 32 Ga. App. 663 (124 S. E. 356) that, where the prefix 7W was omitted from the…