Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. New York City Housing Authority

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 4, 1957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment.

The suit is one by Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, surety on the bond of Caruso-Stureey Corporation, a building contractor, to recover the sum of $46,392.51 from defendant New York City Housing Authority, hereinafter referred to as the owner. That sum is the amount equal to the unpaid balance of the contract price for heating and ventilating work that the contractor agreed to do for the owner. Plaintiff, as surety on the contract, paid laborers and materialmen whom the contractor in breach of its contract had failed to pay.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Triborough Bridge AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. United States v. Kings County Iron Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. New York City Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wolverine Insurance Company v. PhillipsDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API