Legal Opinion

Eidman v. Goldsmith

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 1997No. 93-3087-E-2; CA A88585PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

This boundary dispute concerns three adjacent landowners on the outskirts of Phoenix, Oregon, in Jackson County. Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title on two strips of land along the north and east boundaries of her property. The strips are included in the legal description of her parcel but lie outside the existing fencing on the property. The trial court dismissed plaintiffs case against defendants Jones, who owned the north adjoining property and sold it before trial, and entered judgment quieting title in favor of defendants Porras, the adjoining landowners on plaintiffs east side.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Zink v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Blaisdell v. NelsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Hammack v. OldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Neff v. Sandtrax, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Bahr v. ImusUtah Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API