Legal Opinion

Nix ex rel. Estate of Hawkins v. Mercury Motor Express, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 9, 1978No. 20634Published

1DissentNess, Justice

Disagreeing with the view of the majority, I would affirm in part.

A duly appointed administrator is the proper party to bring an action for wrongful death. See Section 15-5-70, 15-5-80 and 15-51-20 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976); Glenn v. DuPont, 254 S. C. 128, 174 S. E. (2d) 155 (1970); In Re Estate of Mayo, 60 S. C. 401, 38 S. E. 634 (1901). Since no challenge to Nix’s appointment was made in the Probate Court, appellant may not now collaterally attack his appointment.1 Therefore, the trial court properly refused the motion for change of venue since Nix brought the suit…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Caribbean Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Nienow v. NienowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. Lawrence v. Craven Tire Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1969
  4. In Re Estate of MayoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  5. Hall v. MurphySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API