Legal Opinion

Kahan v. Rosner

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2009Published

1Opinion of the Court

*616OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin Schneier, J.

The primary issue presented in this proceeding is should the rabbinical court’s arbitration award made pursuant to the rabbinical court’s requirement that the attorney chosen by any of the parties “would have to be approved by the Rabbinical Court,” which did not approve the attorney chosen by the petitioner, be confirmed if the petitioner thereafter participated in the arbitration proceedings without objection. This is apparently an issue of first impression in this state.

Petitioner moves, pursuant to CPLR 7511, to vacate an arbitration award dated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mtr. of Abrams (John Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Sartiano v. BeckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Bentz v. BentzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Volpe v. CortesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API