Legal Opinion

A. C. Petri & Bro. v. Lincoln National Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1892No. 3228PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

— The sole question in this case is whether or not the court erred in refusing the appellants’ demand for a jury. In respect to that question, the case is similar to that of the same appellants against the First National Bank of Fond du Lac, decided at a former day of this term (83 Texas, 424). The opinion in that case was delivered by Judge Hobby, of the Commission of Appeals, and was approved by this court. It was there held, that the court did not err in proceeding to try the issues without a jury, although the appellants had made a demand therefor.

But there is a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. PlummerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Hardin v. BlackshearTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. C. H. Allyn & Co. v. P. J. Willis & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. A. C. Petri & Bro. v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Berry v. T. & N. O. R'yTexas Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Aronoff v. Texas Turnpike AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  2. Lebman v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Nalle v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Redden v. HickeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
  5. Blair v. PaggiTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API