Legal Opinion

Rose Hall Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Overseas Banking Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 10, 1983No. Civ. A. 79-182PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

This opinion addresses the entry of judgment on a special verdict pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 49(a). After deliberating for seven and one-half days, a jury, which sat through 81 trial days and what turned out to be 15,564 transcript pages of proceedings, returned its special verdict on March 17,1983. Entry of judgment was deferred for thirty days at the request of counsel. At the end of that period, the parties submitted their proposed forms of judgment. 1

The function of a Court in the present procedural posture — entry of judgment…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Japan Petroleum Co.(Nigeria) Ltd. v. Ashland OilDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1978
  4. Moskowitz v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. Franki Foundation Company, a Corporation v. Alger-Rau & Associates Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weitz Co. v. Mo-Kan Carpet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  2. AE, INC. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  3. Rose Hall, Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Overseas Banking Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
  4. Cooper v. Ross & Roberts, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1986
  5. In Re Air Crash Disaster at Stapleton International AirportDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API