Legal Opinion
Sihly v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 19, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered on or about May 18, 2000, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint and bill of particulars to add claims for violations of Labor Law §§ 200, 240 (1) and 241 (6), unanimously modified, on the facts, only to the extent of granting plaintiffs leave to renew their motion with respect to their proposed Labor Law § 200 claim upon completion of discovery, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
Leave to amend was properly denied since, at this juncture in the litigation, the claims plaintiffs propose to add…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Nieves v. Five Boro Air Conditioning & Refrigeration Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hawkins v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Koss v. Board of Trustees of the Fashion Institute of TechnologyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vasiliades v. Lehrer McGovern & Bovis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Hasty v. Solvay Mill Limited PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Maday v. Gabe's Contracting, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Sajid v. Tribeca North Associates L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Reyes v. Magnetic Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.