Legal Opinion

In re Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 29, 1969No. 4-68-Bky 1246PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LARSON, District Judge.

The case of Associated Electronic Supply Co. of Omaha v. C. B. S. Electronic Sales Corp., 288 F.2d 683 (8 Cir. 1961), states that a counterclaim may not be asserted as a basis for the recovery of a judgment for damages against a petitioning creditor. See also, Schreffler v. Schreffler, 155 F.2d 221, 222,10 Cir., and decisions at United States v. Verrier, 179 F.Supp. 336 and In re Love B. Woods & Co., 222 F.Supp. 161.

ORDER

The motion to dismiss Shuron Continental, Division of Textron, Inc., as a petitioning creditor has been dismissed by the Alleged Bankrupt.

The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. VerrierDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1959
  2. Associated Electronic Supply Co. Of Omaha, Alleged Bankrupt v. C.B.S. Electronic Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  3. In Re Love B. Woods & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  4. Schreffler v. SchrefflerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Bichel Optical Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API