Legal Opinion

Ralph Geise v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 16, 1959No. 16048PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for a rehearing is denied. The gist of the matter here is that the rule is well settled that under the circumstances of this case some persons may properly be excluded from the court room. Cf. People v. Jelke, 308 N. Y. 56, 123 N.E.2d 769, 772, 48 A.L.R.2d 1425. That is our holding here. We also hold that appellant cannot complain of the failure of the court to revoke its exclusion order after the minor witness had testified, since appellant made no request therefor. That is particularly true in this case which is not an appeal from the conviction, but an attempted collateral…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. JelkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. MATTER OF UNITED PRESS ASSNS. v. ValenteNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. SorrentinoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  4. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. RLR v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. United States v. Callie Blaine EisnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  4. Claude Jason Lewis v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1965
  5. United States Ex Rel. Smallwood v. LaValleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API