Faulk v. Pinnell
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from the District Court of Ouachita, Willson, J. cited 5 Mart. 381. 7 La. 460. referred to the Code of Practice, arts. 733, 734. Civil Code, arts. 2231, 2232. 1 Mart. N. S. 237. 6 lb. 466, 531. 4 La. 322, 6 lb. 66. 1 Robinson, 408.
1Opinion of the CourtSimon, J.
The defendant is appellant from an order of seizure and sale, granted on the application of the plaintiff, on his filing, with his petition, a copy of a proces-verbal of sale, made by the Judge of the Court of Probates of the parish of Ouachita, accompanied by a note of hand, subscribed by the defendant, and signed “ ne varietur,” by the Probate Judge.
Among the errors assigned by the appellant, as apparent on the face of the record, it is stated, that the proces-verbal, on which the order of seizure and sale was granted, is not signed by the purchaser, nor by two witnesses, so as to make it…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Palfrey v. RivasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1820
- Babin v. WinchesterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1834
- Lee v. DearmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brooks v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1848
- Pleasants v. DunkinTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Lafiton v. DoironSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
- Ranson v. LongSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858