Legal Opinion

Lamerson v. Marvin

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1850PublishedCited by 32 opinions

This action was upon a bond given by the defendant to John H. Tomlinson, on the 13th of August, 1847, to secure the purchase price of certain premises in the village of Baldwinsville, for which premises Tomlinson at the same time executed to the defendant a deed with covenants of warranty and for quiet enjoyment.

Read the full summary

This action was upon a bond given by the defendant to John H. Tomlinson, on the 13th of August, 1847, to secure the purchase price of certain premises in the village of Baldwinsville, for which premises Tomlinson at the same time executed to the defendant a deed with covenants of warranty and for quiet enjoyment. The defendant, in his answer, set up a fraudulent misrepresentation on the part of Tomlinson, as to the title, arid alledged that the title was. in one Isaac T. Minard, instead of Tomlinson, at the time of the giving of the deed; and that the defendant did not acquire any title…

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

1. The question first made by the counsel for the plaintiff is, that the mortgage sale, under which it is claimed that Minard acquired the title to the lot and premises sold to the defendant, was irregular and void, and that Minard in truth acquired no title thereto; for the reason that the mortgaged' premises consisted of distinct lots and parcels, which should have been sold separately. It is provided by the statute regulating the foreclosure of mortgages by advertisement, (2 R. S. 546, § 6,) that if the mortgaged premises consist of distinct farms, tracts or lots, they shall be sold…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reab v. McAlisterCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
  2. M'Allister v. ReabNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  3. Burton v. StewartNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  4. Greenleaf v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  5. Giles v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Baltimore Teachers Union, American Federation of Teachers Local 340, Afl-Cio the City Union of Baltimore, American Federation of Teachers, Local 800, Afl-Cio v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore Kurt L. Schmoke, Individually and in His Capacity as Mayor and Member of the Board of Estimates of Baltimore City Mary Pat Clarke, Individually and in Her Capacity as President of the Baltimore City Council and Member of the Board of Estimates of Baltimore City Jacqueline F. McClean Individually and in Her Capacity as Comptroller and Member of the Board of Estimates of Baltimore City Neal Janey, in His Capacity as Member of the Board of Estimates of Baltimore City George F. Balog, Individually and in His Capacity as Member of the Board of Estimates of Baltimore City Board of Estimates of Baltimore City, in Re State of Maryland v. Baltimore Teachers Union, American Federation of Teachers Local 340, Afl-Cio the City Union of Baltimore, American Federation of Teachers, Local 800, Afl-Cio v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore Kurt L. Schmoke, Individually and in His Capacity as Mayor and Member of the Board of Estimates of Baltimore City Mary Pat Clarke, Individually and in Her Capacity as President of the Baltimore City Council and Member of the Board of Estimates of Baltimore City Jacqueline F. McClean Individually and in Her Capacity as Comptroller and Member of the Board of Estimates of Baltimore City Neal Janey, in His Capacity as Member of the Board of Estimates of Baltimore City George F. Balog, Individually and in His Capacity as Member of the Board of Estimates of Baltimore City Board of Estimates of Baltimore City, Baltimore City Lodge Number 3 Fraternal Order of Police v. Mayor and City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  2. Ellsworth v. . LockwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Sherman v. . WillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  4. Clemente v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  5. Robert F. Simone v. Golden Nugget Hotel and Casino, Trading as G.N.A.C. Corp., Robert F. Simone v. Golden Nugget Hotel and Casino, Trading as G.N.A.C., Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API