Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baumgartner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1977No. 7653Published

1DissentGulotta, Judge

I dissent.

The record supports the trial judge’s findings that defendant-driver, William N. Morgan, was negligent in failing “to see what he could or should have seen” and that Morgan had the last clear chance to avoid the accident. Moreover, the evidence leads me to conclude further, as the trial judge apparently did, that the contributorily negligent pedestrian, Henry H. Baumgartner, did not have such a last clear chance. Accordingly, I would affirm the lower court’s finding of liability.

Elmon F. Randolph, an expert in accident investigation and reconstruction upon whom the trial judge…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jackson v. CookSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  2. Rottman v. BeverlySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. Bergeron v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  4. Guilbeau v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  5. Fontenot v. FreudensteinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1941

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API